In a hurry..— What to do?
What to do?
How to show that this was not a Special Operation,
but a CFIT — the fault of the Polish pilots…
The Russians were eager to publish and imprint their (fabricated) version of events in the public consciousness as quickly as possible.
Despite their well-known mastery in manipulating, deceiving, and concealing the truth,
they still made a critical mistake.
They brought the fabricated trajectory of the final segment of the flight
too far down into the ravine…
This is clearly visible on the diagram.

But this becomes clearly visible only when you put on the diagram from the Preliminary Report the points whose coordinates are given in the Report.
I did this…

— And this is how it would look in reality:
the aircraft would have hit the ground while descending…

The MAK/Russians wanted to cover up this blunder,
so quickly — in July 2010 — they arranged a staged demonstration, a manipulation,
on a simulator in Moscow, into which they easily drew the naïve Dr. Edmund Klich, who took part in this experiment as if it were for Sheremetyevo airport… and noticed nothing suspicious.
The Russians supposedly performed on the simulator a go-around maneuver “like in Smolensk,”
with “parameters like in Smolensk,”
but in reality they hid some of the parameters (for example, engine power setting)
and ignored the fact that in Smolensk the terrain was rising — and quite noticeably.
In the simulator experiment the terrain was… flat.
And so, in the Tu-154M simulator experiment, it was not possible to transition to a climb
when starting the maneuver at 20 meters above the ground…
.But they described it in such a way that supposedly
the result of the experiment matched the MAK Preliminary Report.

And so,
clearly and with evidence, I have proven
that the Russian MAK narrative about an alleged CFIT,
about the supposed fault of the pilots,
is a LIE.
Nothing can be done about it now.
It cannot be hidden.
The Russian version about an alleged CFIT
is a LIE.
The milk has been spilled.
Dodaj komentarz